skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index
Refined by: Database: BMJ Open Access Journals remove
Result Number Material Type Add to My Shelf Action Record Details and Options
1
Effect of revealing authors’ conflicts of interests in peer review: randomized controlled trial
Material Type:
Article
Add to My Research

Effect of revealing authors’ conflicts of interests in peer review: randomized controlled trial

BMJ (Online), 2019-11, Vol.367, p.l5896-l5896 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions 2019 BMJ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to 2019 BMJ ;ISSN: 0959-8138 ;EISSN: 1756-1833 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l5896 ;PMID: 31694810

Full text available

2
Revising ethical guidance for the evaluation of programmes and interventions not initiated by researchers
Material Type:
Article
Add to My Research

Revising ethical guidance for the evaluation of programmes and interventions not initiated by researchers

Journal of medical ethics, 2020-01, Vol.46 (1), p.26-30 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. ;2020 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. 2020 ;ISSN: 0306-6800 ;EISSN: 1473-4257 ;DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105263 ;PMID: 31481472

Full text available

3
Registration audit of clinical trials given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees
Material Type:
Article
Add to My Research

Registration audit of clinical trials given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees

BMJ open, 2019-02, Vol.9 (2), p.e026840-e026840 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. ;2019 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2019 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026840 ;PMID: 30796130

Full text available

4
Researcher allegiance in research on psychosocial interventions: meta-research study protocol and pilot study
Material Type:
Article
Add to My Research

Researcher allegiance in research on psychosocial interventions: meta-research study protocol and pilot study

BMJ open, 2019-02, Vol.9 (2), p.e024622-e024622 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. ;2019 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2019 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024622 ;PMID: 30782912

Full text available

5
Identifying bioethical issues in biostatistical consulting: findings from a US national pilot survey of biostatisticians
Material Type:
Article
Add to My Research

Identifying bioethical issues in biostatistical consulting: findings from a US national pilot survey of biostatisticians

BMJ open, 2017-11, Vol.7 (11), p.e018491-e018491 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. ;2017 Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. 2017 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018491 ;PMID: 29146653

Full text available

6
Incorporating ethical principles into clinical research protocols: a tool for protocol writers and ethics committees
Material Type:
Article
Add to My Research

Incorporating ethical principles into clinical research protocols: a tool for protocol writers and ethics committees

Journal of medical ethics, 2016-04, Vol.42 (4), p.229-234 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing ;2016 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics ;Copyright: 2016 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016 ;ISSN: 0306-6800 ;EISSN: 1473-4257 ;DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102540 ;PMID: 26811365 ;CODEN: JMETDR

Full text available

7
Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study
Material Type:
Article
Add to My Research

Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study

BMJ open, 2016-09, Vol.6 (9), p.e012931-e012931 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012931 ;PMID: 27625066

Full text available

8
To research (or not) that is the question: ethical issues in research when medical care is disrupted by political action: a case study from Eldoret, Kenya
Material Type:
Article
Add to My Research

To research (or not) that is the question: ethical issues in research when medical care is disrupted by political action: a case study from Eldoret, Kenya

Journal of medical ethics, 2016-01, Vol.42 (1), p.61-65 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing ;2015 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics ;Copyright: 2015 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2015 ;ISSN: 0306-6800 ;EISSN: 1473-4257 ;DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101490 ;PMID: 26474601 ;CODEN: JMETDR

Full text available

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait