skip to main content
Language:
Primo Advanced Search
Primo Advanced Search Query Term
Primo Advanced Search Query Term
Primo Advanced Search Query Term
Primo Advanced Search Query Term
Primo Advanced Search Query Term
Primo Advanced Search prefilters
Simple Search

Results 1 - 20 of 32,315  for All Library Resources

Sorted by: Sorted by: RelevanceOr hit Enter to replace sort method
Results 1 2 3 4 5 next page
Refined by: Journal Title: Bmj Open remove subject: Medicine, General & Internal remove
Result Number Material Type Add to My Shelf Action Record Details and Options
1
Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study
Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study

BMJ open, 2020-04, Vol.10 (4), p.e033516-e033516 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. ;2020 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. 2020 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033516 ;PMID: 32273313

Full text available

Citations Cited by
2
Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review
Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review

BMJ open, 2018-03, Vol.8 (3), p.e019703-e019703 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. ;2018 Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. 2018 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019703 ;PMID: 29540417

Full text available

Citations Cited by
3
Role of feasibility and pilot studies in randomised controlled trials: a cross-sectional study
Role of feasibility and pilot studies in randomised controlled trials: a cross-sectional study
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Role of feasibility and pilot studies in randomised controlled trials: a cross-sectional study

BMJ open, 2018-09, Vol.8 (9), p.e022233 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. ;2018 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. 2018 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022233 ;PMID: 30257847

Full text available

Citations Cited by
4
Is omission of free text records a possible source of data loss and bias in Clinical Practice Research Datalink studies? A case–control study
Is omission of free text records a possible source of data loss and bias in Clinical Practice Research Datalink studies? A case–control study
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Is omission of free text records a possible source of data loss and bias in Clinical Practice Research Datalink studies? A case–control study

BMJ open, 2016-05, Vol.6 (5), p.e011664-e011664 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011664 ;PMID: 27178981

Full text available

Citations Cited by
5
Strategies to enhance recruitment and consent to intensive care studies: a qualitative study with researchers and patient–public involvement contributors
Strategies to enhance recruitment and consent to intensive care studies: a qualitative study with researchers and patient–public involvement contributors
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Strategies to enhance recruitment and consent to intensive care studies: a qualitative study with researchers and patient–public involvement contributors

BMJ open, 2021-09, Vol.11 (9), p.e048193-e048193 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. ;2021 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2021 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048193 ;PMID: 34551943

Full text available

Citations Cited by
6
Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS)
Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS)
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS)

BMJ open, 2016-12, Vol.6 (12), p.e011458-e011458 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/. ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011458 ;PMID: 27932337

Full text available

Citations Cited by
7
Prevalence of chronic pain in the UK: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies
Prevalence of chronic pain in the UK: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Prevalence of chronic pain in the UK: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies

BMJ open, 2016-05, Vol.6 (6), p.e010364-e010364 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010364 ;PMID: 27324708

Full text available

Citations Cited by
8
Parents’ uptake of human papillomavirus vaccines for their children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Parents’ uptake of human papillomavirus vaccines for their children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Parents’ uptake of human papillomavirus vaccines for their children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

BMJ open, 2018-04, Vol.8 (4), p.e019206-e019206 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. ;2018 Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. 2018 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019206 ;PMID: 29678965

Full text available

Citations Cited by
9
Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI): explanation and elaboration document
Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI): explanation and elaboration document
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI): explanation and elaboration document

BMJ open, 2017-04, Vol.7 (4), p.e013318-e013318 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/. ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2017 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2017 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013318 ;PMID: 28373250

Full text available

Citations Cited by
10
Demographic risk factors for COVID-19 infection, severity, ICU admission and death: a meta-analysis of 59 studies
Demographic risk factors for COVID-19 infection, severity, ICU admission and death: a meta-analysis of 59 studies
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Demographic risk factors for COVID-19 infection, severity, ICU admission and death: a meta-analysis of 59 studies

BMJ open, 2021-01, Vol.11 (1), p.e044640-e044640 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. ;2021 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2021 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044640 ;PMID: 33431495

Full text available

Citations Cited by
11
Impact of including or excluding both-armed zero-event studies on using standard meta-analysis methods for rare event outcome: a simulation study
Impact of including or excluding both-armed zero-event studies on using standard meta-analysis methods for rare event outcome: a simulation study
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Impact of including or excluding both-armed zero-event studies on using standard meta-analysis methods for rare event outcome: a simulation study

BMJ open, 2016-08, Vol.6 (8), p.e010983-e010983 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010983 ;PMID: 27531725

Full text available

Citations Cited by
12
Mandated reporters’ experiences with reporting child maltreatment: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
Mandated reporters’ experiences with reporting child maltreatment: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Mandated reporters’ experiences with reporting child maltreatment: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

BMJ open, 2017-10, Vol.7 (10), p.e013942-e013942 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. ;2017 Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. 2017 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013942 ;PMID: 29042370

Full text available

Citations Cited by
13
Improving quality in clinical placement studies in nursing homes (QUALinCLINstud): the study protocol of a participatory mixed-methods multiple case study design
Improving quality in clinical placement studies in nursing homes (QUALinCLINstud): the study protocol of a participatory mixed-methods multiple case study design
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Improving quality in clinical placement studies in nursing homes (QUALinCLINstud): the study protocol of a participatory mixed-methods multiple case study design

BMJ open, 2020-10, Vol.10 (10), p.e040491-e040491 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. ;2020 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2020 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040491 ;PMID: 33127638

Full text available

Citations Cited by
14
Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies
Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies

BMJ open, 2017-02, Vol.7 (2), p.e013537-e013537 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/. ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2017 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2017 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013537 ;PMID: 28213598

Full text available

Citations Cited by
15
Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence

BMJ open, 2021-07, Vol.11 (7), p.e048008-e048008 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. ;2021 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. 2021 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048008 ;PMID: 34244270

Full text available

Citations Cited by
16
Rate of normal lung function decline in ageing adults: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies
Rate of normal lung function decline in ageing adults: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Rate of normal lung function decline in ageing adults: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies

BMJ open, 2019-06, Vol.9 (6), p.e028150-e028150 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. ;2019 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2019 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028150 ;PMID: 31248928

Full text available

Citations Cited by
17
Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC)
Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC)
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC)

BMJ open, 2020-12, Vol.10 (12), p.e040478-e040478 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. ;2020 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2020 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040478 ;PMID: 33334836

Full text available

Citations Cited by
18
Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study)
Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study)
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study)

BMJ open, 2022-02, Vol.12 (2), p.e051073-e051073 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. ;2022 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2022 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051073 ;PMID: 35144946

Full text available

Citations Cited by
19
Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study
Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study

BMJ open, 2018-03, Vol.8 (3), p.e020452-e020452 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. ;2018 Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. 2018 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020452 ;PMID: 29572398

Full text available

Citations Cited by
20
Diabetes, hypertension, body mass index, smoking and COVID-19-related mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Diabetes, hypertension, body mass index, smoking and COVID-19-related mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Material Type:
Article 		Add to My Research

Diabetes, hypertension, body mass index, smoking and COVID-19-related mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

BMJ open, 2021-10, Vol.11 (10), p.e052777 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. ;2021 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;Attribution - NonCommercial ;Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2021 ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052777 ;PMID: 34697120

Full text available

Citations Cited by

Results 1 - 20 of 32,315  for All Library Resources

Sorted by: Sorted by: RelevanceOr hit Enter to replace sort method
Results 1 2 3 4 5 next page

Personalize your results

  1. Edit

Refine Search Results

Expand My Results

  1.   

Refine My Results

Creation Date 

From To
Refine
  1. Before 2013  (791)
  2. 2013 To 2014  (2,003)
  3. 2015 To 2016  (3,339)
  4. 2017 To 2019  (8,932)
  5. After 2019  (17,250)
  6. More options open sub menu

Subject 

  1. Humans  (22,385)
  2. Female  (10,580)
  3. Patients  (9,422)
  4. Public Health  (9,313)
  5. Male  (8,486)
  6. Adult  (7,337)
  7. Systematic Review  (6,586)
  8. Epidemiology  (6,173)
  9. Middle Aged  (5,562)
  10. Mortality  (5,326)
  11. Population  (5,115)
  12. Aged  (4,945)
  13. Hospitals  (4,866)
  14. Cross-Sectional Studies  (4,581)
  15. Questionnaires  (4,561)
  16. Intervention  (4,507)
  17. More options open sub menu

Language 

  1. Japanese  (1,425)
  2. Norwegian  (192)
  3. More options open sub menu
INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY (84-028) 37 755 057 Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn

Copyright © 2017 INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait