skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Effectiveness and Safety of Controlled Venous Pressure in Liver Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BioMed research international, 2015-01, Vol.2015, p.290234-10 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Copyright © 2015 Xue Liang Zhang et al. ;COPYRIGHT 2015 Hindawi Limited ;Copyright © 2015 Xue Liang Zhang et al. Xue Liang Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ;Copyright © 2015 Xue Liang Zhang et al. 2015 ;ISSN: 2314-6133 ;EISSN: 2314-6141 ;DOI: 10.1155/2015/290234 ;PMID: 26075222

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Effectiveness and Safety of Controlled Venous Pressure in Liver Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
  • Author: Zhang, Xue Liang ; Wang, Wen Ji ; Wang, Wen Jin ; Cao, Nong
  • Pikhart, Hynek
  • Subjects: Anesthesia ; Blood Loss, Surgical - prevention & control ; Central Venous Pressure ; Constriction ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods ; Humans ; Liver ; Liver - surgery ; Methods ; Patient outcomes ; Physiological aspects ; Review ; Safety ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Vena Cava, Inferior ; Venous pressure
  • Is Part Of: BioMed research international, 2015-01, Vol.2015, p.290234-10
  • Description: Objective. To investigate the effectiveness and safety of controlled venous pressure in liver surgery and further to compare the clinical outcomes of low central venous pressure by infrahepatic inferior vena cava clamping (IVCC) and intraoperative anesthetic control (IAC). Methods. Online databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinical trials.gov, and China biology medicine database were comprehensively searched. After identifying relevant studies out of the search results, quality assessment was performed according to the methods recommended by the Cochrane collaboration. And meta-analysis was performed by both direct comparison and indirect comparison. Results. Thirteen studies containing 1252 patients were included. Compared with control, controlled venous pressure significantly decreased central venous pressure, total blood loss, blood loss during transection, transfusion rate, and total incidence of complications. Further analysis of IVCC and IAC showed that there was no significant difference in aspects of main clinical outcomes. Conclusions. Controlled venous pressure significantly decreased central venous pressure and achieved improvement of bleeding control in liver surgery. It reduced total incidence of complications and chest infection, while it caused concerns about heart disorder. Although IVCC was not worse than IAC in therapeutic effect, a superiority between them still needs to be explored.
  • Publisher: United States: Hindawi Publishing Corporation
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 2314-6133
    EISSN: 2314-6141
    DOI: 10.1155/2015/290234
    PMID: 26075222
  • Source: MEDLINE
    PubMed Central
    ProQuest Central
Back to results list
INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY (84-028) 37 755 057 Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn

Copyright © 2017 INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait