skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

GRADE approach to drawing conclusions from a network meta-analysis using a minimally contextualised framework

BMJ (Online), 2020-11, Vol.371, p.m3900-m3900 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go tohttp://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions2020BMJ ;ISSN: 1756-1833 ;EISSN: 1756-1833 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m3900

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    GRADE approach to drawing conclusions from a network meta-analysis using a minimally contextualised framework
  • Author: Brignardello-Petersen, Romina ; Florez, Ivan D ; Izcovich, Ariel ; Santesso, Nancy ; Hazlewood, Glen ; Alhazanni, Waleed ; Yepes-Nuñez, Juan José ; Tomlinson, George ; Schünemann, Holger J ; Guyatt, Gordon H
  • Subjects: Diarrhea ; Estimates ; Feedback ; Gastroenteritis ; Intervention ; Pediatrics ; Systematic review ; Working groups
  • Is Part Of: BMJ (Online), 2020-11, Vol.371, p.m3900-m3900
  • Description: This article describes GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation) guidance on how to draw conclusions from a network meta-analysis of interventions that includes individual randomised controlled trials addressing a single outcome. The guidance uses a minimally contextualised approach that avoids value judgments regarding the magnitude of intervention effects. The framework is based on two principles: interventions should be grouped in categories, from the most to the least effective or harmful; and the judgments that place interventions in such categories should simultaneously consider the estimates of effect, the certainty of the evidence, and the rankings. The framework includes five steps, which we describe and illustrate using an example. The framework is simple, methodologically sound, and flexible, allowing for modifications to resolve situations in which additional complexity or value judgments might be appropriate.
  • Publisher: London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 1756-1833
    EISSN: 1756-1833
    DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m3900
  • Source: ProQuest Central

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait