skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Probing the Construct Validity of LLAMA_D as a Measure of Implicit Learning Aptitude: Incidental Instructions, Confidence Ratings, and Reaction Time

Studies in second language acquisition, 2021-07, Vol.43 (3), p.663-676 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;ISSN: 0272-2631 ;EISSN: 1470-1545 ;DOI: 10.1017/S0272263120000704

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Probing the Construct Validity of LLAMA_D as a Measure of Implicit Learning Aptitude: Incidental Instructions, Confidence Ratings, and Reaction Time
  • Author: Suzuki, Yuichi
  • Subjects: Accuracy ; Aptitude Tests ; Confidence ; Construct Validity ; Fluency ; Incidental Learning ; Knowledge ; Language ; Language Aptitude ; Language Fluency ; Language Tests ; Learning ; Linguistics ; Memory ; Oral Language ; Reaction Time ; Validation studies ; Validity
  • Is Part Of: Studies in second language acquisition, 2021-07, Vol.43 (3), p.663-676
  • Description: A subtest of the LLAMA test battery (LLAMA_D) has been proposed as a potential test of implicit learning aptitude. To improve its construct validity, in the present study, the original LLAMA_D (a) instructions for incidental learning were modified, and (b) confidence ratings of test responses and (c) reaction time (RT) measurements were added. This revised LLAMA_D was administered along with the other LLAMA subtests (LLAMA-B, -E, and -F). Unconscious knowledge that may (not) result from the exposure was assessed through the relationship between the accuracy/RT and confidence ratings. The results suggest that LLAMA_D accuracy largely reflects conscious retrieval of previously heard sound sequences. However, an index derived from the LLAMA_D RT measure (coefficient of variance) was associated with an aspect of oral fluency, which is presumably dependent on proceduralization. Several recommendations are proposed to redesign and extend LLAMA_D as a potential aptitude test for proceduralization.
  • Publisher: New York: Cambridge University Press
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 0272-2631
    EISSN: 1470-1545
    DOI: 10.1017/S0272263120000704
  • Source: ProQuest One Psychology
    Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)
    ProQuest Central
Back to results list
INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY (84-028) 37 755 057 Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn

Copyright © 2017 INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait