skip to main content
Guest
My Research
My Account
Sign out
Sign in
This feature requires javascript
Library Search
Find Databases
Browse Search
E-Journals A-Z
E-Books A-Z
Citation Linker
Help
Language:
English
Vietnamese
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
All Library Resources
All
Course Materials
Course Materials
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
All Library Resources
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
All Library Resources
Search in:
Print Resources
Search in:
Digital Resources
Search in:
Online E-Resources
Advanced Search
Browse Search
This feature requires javascript
Search Limited to:
Search Limited to:
Resource type
criteria input
All items
Books
Articles
Images
Audio Visual
Maps
Graduate theses
Show Results with:
criteria input
that contain my query words
with my exact phrase
starts with
Show Results with:
Search type Index
criteria input
anywhere in the record
in the title
as author/creator
in subject
Full Text
ISBN
ISSN
TOC
Keyword
Field
Show Results with:
in the title
Show Results with:
anywhere in the record
in the title
as author/creator
in subject
Full Text
ISBN
ISSN
TOC
Keyword
Field
This feature requires javascript
Notes
Nature (London), 1918-03, Vol.101 (2524), p.27-30
[Peer Reviewed Journal]
ISSN: 0028-0836 ;EISSN: 1476-4687 ;DOI: 10.1038/101027a0
Full text available
Citations
Cited by
View Online
Details
Recommendations
Reviews
Times Cited
External Links
This feature requires javascript
Actions
Add to My Research
Remove from My Research
E-mail
Print
Permalink
Citation
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
Delicious
Export RIS
Export BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Title:
Notes
Is Part Of:
Nature (London), 1918-03, Vol.101 (2524), p.27-30
Description:
THE letters that have appeared recently in the Times and in articles elsewhere on the effect of electric action on the growth of plants show a readiness to believe that almost any wonders may be wrought by electricity. Most scientific workers will agree with Prof. Armstrong and Sir James Crichton-Browne in their scepticism as to the proved value of electrical treatment as a general method of increasing crop production. It is asserted that by the electrical treatment of seeds increases of yield of 20 to 80 per cent. may be produced. The statement seems to refer to a commercial process in which, apparently, seeds are subjected to the combined action of electric currents and certain solutions; in the method electrolysis appears to play some part. The process seems based on the treatment known to physicians as "ionic medication," and used, for example, for the reduction of swollen joints. Treatment of seeds in this way appears to have no sound physiological basis, and no data derived from experiments carried out under critical conditions appear to be available, so that it is impossible to evaluate the method. No one who knows the difficulty of carrying out satisfactory agricultural experiments, and the ease with which a few favourable but illusory results can be obtained, is likely to accept the views of a few farmers as convincing evidence of the value of the process. The method of treatment of the growing plant with a high-tension discharge from overhead wires has been before the public for some years; it is certainly more promising, but it is generally admitted to be in a purely experimental stage.
Language:
English
Identifier:
ISSN: 0028-0836
EISSN: 1476-4687
DOI: 10.1038/101027a0
Source:
Alma/SFX Local Collection
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Back to results list
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait
Searching for
in
scope:(TDTS),scope:(SFX),scope:(TDT),scope:(SEN),primo_central_multiple_fe
Show me what you have so far
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript