skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

The Pioneering Role of Sci in Post Publication Public Peer Review (P4R)

Publications (Basel), 2021-03, Vol.9 (1), p.13 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;ISSN: 2304-6775 ;EISSN: 2304-6775 ;DOI: 10.3390/publications9010013

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    The Pioneering Role of Sci in Post Publication Public Peer Review (P4R)
  • Author: Abdin, Ahmad Yaman ; Nasim, Muhammad Jawad ; Ney, Yannick ; Jacob, Claus
  • Subjects: 17th century ; commenting options ; Communication ; Journals (Academic) ; Open access publishing ; open peer review ; Peer review ; public assessment ; reward system ; Scholarly publishing ; Sci ; Science ; Scientists
  • Is Part Of: Publications (Basel), 2021-03, Vol.9 (1), p.13
  • Description: Scientists observe, discover, justify and eventually share their findings with the scientific community. Dissemination is an integral aspect of scientific discovery, since discoveries which go unnoticed have no or little impact on science. Today, peer review is part of this process of scientific dissemination as it contributes proactively to the quality of a scientific article. As the numbers of scientific journals and scientific articles published therein are increasing steadily, processes such as the single-blind or double-blind peer review are facing a near collapse situation. In fact, these traditional forms of reviewing have reached their limits and, because of this, are also increasingly considered as unfair, sloppy, superficial and even biased. In this manuscript, we propose forms of post-publication public peer review (P4R) as valuable alternatives to the traditional blind peer review system. We describe how the journal Sci has explored such an approach and provide first empirical evidence of the benefits and also challenges, such a P4R approach faces.
  • Publisher: Basel: MDPI AG
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 2304-6775
    EISSN: 2304-6775
    DOI: 10.3390/publications9010013
  • Source: Coronavirus Research Database
    ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
    ProQuest Central
    DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Back to results list
INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY (84-028) 37 755 057 Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn

Copyright © 2017 INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait