skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Comparison of 3D Surface Rendering CT to Plain Lateral Radiographs for Quantification and Characterisation of Posterior Malleolar Fracture Fragment Size and Morphology

Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2022-01, Vol.7 (1), p.2473011421S00498 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

The Author(s) 2022 ;The Author(s) 2022. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;The Author(s) 2022 2022 American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses. ;ISSN: 2473-0114 ;EISSN: 2473-0114 ;DOI: 10.1177/2473011421S00498 ;PMID: 35097984

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Comparison of 3D Surface Rendering CT to Plain Lateral Radiographs for Quantification and Characterisation of Posterior Malleolar Fracture Fragment Size and Morphology
  • Author: Weigelt, Lizzy ; Mason, Lyndon W. ; Lambert, Laura-Ann ; Heyes, Gavin
  • Subjects: Morphology
  • Is Part Of: Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2022-01, Vol.7 (1), p.2473011421S00498
  • Description: Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the size of the posterior malleolar fracture (PMF) fragment on plain lateral radiographs compared to three-dimensional (3D) surface rendering CT imaging, and to compare both modalities in the characterisation of PMF morphology. Methods: Measurements of 180 lateral radiographs of PMF's were compared to their respective 3D surface rendering CT reconstructions, by two independent observers reviewing percentage articular involvement of the PMF fragment. Morphology of the PMF was categorised initially by the CT scan as classified by Mason and Molloy and was compared to this classification using radiographs. Results: When calculating the percentage joint surface involved by the PMF fragment, inter-observer variability was greater than 0.8 for radiographic and CT measurement. Significant differences in size of PMF on radiograph compared to CT were found for type 1 and type 2A fractures (p<0001 type 1, p=.071 type 2A). Radiographs consistently over-estimated the PMF fragment size, although in type 2B fracture patterns there was an equivalent number that were under-estimated due to the underappreciation of the posteromedial fragment. Comparison of fracture fragment morphology found that type 2A and 2B fractures (rotational Pilon's) had poor agreement between radiographs and CT (34.15%). Conclusion: This study shows that the use of a lateral radiograph in a PMF to estimate fracture size and morphology is poor. Additional CT imaging is imperative to allow for appropriate treatment planning in the management of PMF.
  • Publisher: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 2473-0114
    EISSN: 2473-0114
    DOI: 10.1177/2473011421S00498
    PMID: 35097984
  • Source: SAGE Open Access Journals
    PubMed Central
    ProQuest Central
    DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait