Language:

Predicting Verbal Coercion Following Sexual Refusal During a Hookup: Diverging Gender Patterns

Sex roles, 2010-05, Vol.62 (9-10), p.647-660 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 ;2015 INIST-CNRS ;ISSN: 0360-0025 ;EISSN: 1573-2762 ;DOI: 10.1007/s11199-010-9763-9 ;CODEN: SROLDH

Full text available

Citations Cited by

Actions
1. Add to My Research
2. Remove from My Research
3. E-mail
4. Print
5. Permalink
6. Citation
7. EasyBib
8. EndNote
9. RefWorks
10. Delicious
11. Export RIS
12. Export BibTeX

Title:
Predicting Verbal Coercion Following Sexual Refusal During a Hookup: Diverging Gender Patterns
Author: Wright, Margaret O’Dougherty ; Norton, Dana L. ; Matusek, Jill Anne
Subjects: Adult ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; College students ; Emotions ; Females ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gender differences ; Gender Studies ; Heterosexuality ; Internet ; Males ; Medical sciences ; Medicine/Public Health ; Original Article ; Prevention ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Regression analysis ; Sex ; Sex Differences ; Sexual behavior ; Sexual Coercion ; Social psychology ; Social role. Sex role ; Sociology ; Victimology
Is Part Of: Sex roles, 2010-05, Vol.62 (9-10), p.647-660
Description: This online study explored gender differences in affective reactions to sexual refusal during hookups and whether state or trait measures were the best predictors of verbal coercion. The Midwestern U.S. undergraduate sample included 220 men and 50 women previously in situations where they wanted more sexual contact than their heterosexual partner desired. Women reported stronger negative responses on several affect variables, suggesting that such refusals might have resulted in significant expectancy violations. Men reported more experience in handling refusals, consistent with traditional sexual scripts. Logistic regression analyses revealed that dominant men were more likely to coerce when angry or confused, whereas hostile women were more likely to coerce when feeling rejected. The results have important implications for sexual coercion prevention efforts.
Publisher: Boston: Springer US
Language: English
Identifier: ISSN: 0360-0025
EISSN: 1573-2762
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-010-9763-9
CODEN: SROLDH
Source: ProQuest One Psychology
Alma/SFX Local Collection
ProQuest Central

Back to results list


INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY	(84-028) 37 755 057	Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM	thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn	Feedback

Predicting Verbal Coercion Following Sexual Refusal During a Hookup: Diverging Gender Patterns

Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 ;2015 INIST-CNRS ;ISSN: 0360-0025 ;EISSN: 1573-2762 ;DOI: 10.1007/s11199-010-9763-9 ;CODEN: SROLDH

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait