skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) cervical cancer staging: A review of gaps and questions that remain

International journal of gynecological cancer, 2020-06, Vol.30 (6), p.873-878 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. ;2020 by the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology. ;2020 IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. ;ISSN: 1048-891X ;EISSN: 1525-1438 ;DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001257 ;PMID: 32241876

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) cervical cancer staging: A review of gaps and questions that remain
  • Author: Salvo, Gloria ; Odetto, Diego ; Pareja, Rene ; Frumovitz, Michael ; Ramirez, Pedro T
  • Subjects: Cervical cancer ; Cervix ; Classification ; Gynecology ; Hydronephrosis ; Lymphatic system ; Medical prognosis ; Metastasis ; Microscopy ; Mortality ; Obstetrics ; Patients ; Tomography ; Tumors ; Vagina
  • Is Part Of: International journal of gynecological cancer, 2020-06, Vol.30 (6), p.873-878
  • Description: Recently the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer was published. In this most recent classification, imaging modalities and pathologic information have been added as tools to determine the final stage of the disease. Although there are many merits to this new staging for cervical cancer, including more detailed categorization of early-stage disease as well as information on nodal distribution, the classification falls short in clarifying areas of controversy in the staging system. Many unanswered questions remain and, as such, a number of gaps lead to further debate in the interpretation of relevant clinical data. Factors such as measurement of tumor size, definition of parametrial involvement, ovarian metastases, lower uterine segment extension, lymph node metastasis, and imaging modalities are explored in this review. The goal is to focus on items that deserve further discussion and clarification in the most recent FIGO staging for cervical cancer.
  • Publisher: England: by the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 1048-891X
    EISSN: 1525-1438
    DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001257
    PMID: 32241876
  • Source: AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait