skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Sustainable development goals: a framework for deploying indicators for higher education institutions

International journal of sustainability in higher education, 2022-04, Vol.23 (4), p.887-914 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Emerald Publishing Limited ;Emerald Publishing Limited. ;ISSN: 1467-6370 ;EISSN: 1758-6739 ;DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-03-2021-0088

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Sustainable development goals: a framework for deploying indicators for higher education institutions
  • Author: Griebeler, Juliane Sapper ; Brandli, Luciana Londero ; Salvia, Amanda Lange ; Leal Filho, Walter ; Reginatto, Giovana
  • Subjects: Acceptance tests ; Achievement ; Annual reports ; Capacity Building ; Colleges & universities ; Education ; Educational Assessment ; Educational Indicators ; Higher Education ; Higher education institutions ; Indicators ; Sustainability ; Sustainable Development
  • Is Part Of: International journal of sustainability in higher education, 2022-04, Vol.23 (4), p.887-914
  • Description: Purpose This paper aims to analyse the extent to which the sustainable development goals (SDGs) are being considered at higher education institutions (HEIs) and propose and test the possible acceptance of a list of indicators to evaluate the contribution of HEIs to the SDGs. Design/methodology/approach The methodology consisted of the collection of indicators of sustainable development based on the existing bibliography. Afterwards, a set of indicators related to the SDGs were selected, based on the most frequent SDGs’ expressions found in the selected indicators. A sample of researchers was also asked to indicate to which extent this set of indicators is perceived as relevant. Findings The results indicated an initial list with 432 indicators, of which 268 were selected for having at least one of the keywords searched for, related to the SDG descriptions and targets. Thus, redundant indicators were excluded and, when necessary, indicators were aggregated, resulting in a final list of 61 indicators. Originality/value The set of indicators resulted from this analysis was considered appropriate to evaluate the contribution of HEIs towards the SDGs, demonstrating that it might not be necessary to create new indicators for that purpose.
  • Publisher: Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 1467-6370
    EISSN: 1758-6739
    DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-03-2021-0088
  • Source: Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)
    AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait