skip to main content
Guest
My Research
My Account
Sign out
Sign in
This feature requires javascript
Library Search
Find Databases
Browse Search
E-Journals A-Z
E-Books A-Z
Citation Linker
Help
Language:
English
Vietnamese
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
All Library Resources
All
Course Materials
Course Materials
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
All Library Resources
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
All Library Resources
Search in:
Print Resources
Search in:
Digital Resources
Search in:
Online E-Resources
Advanced Search
Browse Search
This feature requires javascript
Search Limited to:
Search Limited to:
Resource type
criteria input
All items
Books
Articles
Images
Audio Visual
Maps
Graduate theses
Show Results with:
criteria input
that contain my query words
with my exact phrase
starts with
Show Results with:
Search type Index
criteria input
anywhere in the record
in the title
as author/creator
in subject
Full Text
ISBN
ISSN
TOC
Keyword
Field
Show Results with:
in the title
Show Results with:
anywhere in the record
in the title
as author/creator
in subject
Full Text
ISBN
ISSN
TOC
Keyword
Field
This feature requires javascript
Screening for colorectal cancer with fecal immunochemical testing with and without postpolypectomy surveillance colonoscopy:A cost-effectiveness analysis
ISSN: 0003-4819 ;EISSN: 1539-3704 ;DOI: 10.7326/M16-2891
Digital Resources/Online E-Resources
Citations
Cited by
View Online
Details
Recommendations
Reviews
Times Cited
External Links
This feature requires javascript
Actions
Add to My Research
Remove from My Research
E-mail
Print
Permalink
Citation
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
Delicious
Export RIS
Export BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Title:
Screening for colorectal cancer with fecal immunochemical testing with and without postpolypectomy surveillance colonoscopy:A cost-effectiveness analysis
Author:
Greuter, Marjolein J.E
;
De Klerk, Clasine M
;
Meijer, Gerrit A
;
Dekker, Evelien
;
Coupe, Veerle M.H
Subjects:
Internal Medicine
Description:
Background: Population-based screening to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) death is effective, but the effectiveness of postpolypectomy surveillance is unclear. Objective: To evaluate the additional benefit in terms of costeffectiveness of colonoscopy surveillance in a screening setting. Design: Microsimulation using the ASCCA (Adenoma and Serrated pathway to Colorectal CAncer) model. Data Sources: Dutch CRC screening program and published literature. Target Population: Asymptomatic persons aged 55 to 75 years without a prior CRC diagnosis. Time Horizon: Lifetime. Perspective: Health care payer. Intervention: Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening with colonoscopy surveillance performed according to the Dutch guideline was simulated. The comparator was no screening or surveillance. FIT screening without colonoscopy surveillance and the effect of extending surveillance intervals were also evaluated. Outcome Measures: CRC burden, colonoscopy demand, lifeyears, and costs. Results of Base-Case Analysis: FIT screening without surveillance reduced CRC mortality by 50.4% compared with no screening or surveillance. Adding surveillance to FIT screening reduced mortality by an additional 1.7% to 52.1% but increased lifetime colonoscopy demand by 62% (from 335 to 543 colonoscopies per 1000 persons) at an additional cost of €68 000, for an increase of 0.9 life-year. Extending the surveillance intervals to 5 years reduced CRC mortality by 51.8% and increased colonoscopy demand by 42.7% compared with FIT screening without surveillance. In an incremental analysis, incremental costeffectiveness ratios (ICERs) for screening plus surveillance exceeded the Dutch willingness-to-pay threshold of €36 602 per life-year gained. Results of Sensitivity Analysis: When using a parameter set representing low colorectal lesion prevalence or when colonoscopy costs were halved or colorectal lesion incidence was doubled, screening plus surveillance became cost-effective compared with screening without surveillance. Limitation: Limited data on FIT performance and background CRC risk in the surveillance population. Conclusion: Adding surveillance to FIT screening is not costeffective based on the Dutch ICER threshold and substantially increases colonoscopy demand. Extending surveillance intervals to 5 years would decrease colonoscopy demand without substantial loss of effectiveness. Primary Funding Source: Alpe d'HuZes, Dutch Cancer Society, and Stand Up To Cancer.
Creation Date:
2017-10
Language:
English
Identifier:
ISSN: 0003-4819
EISSN: 1539-3704
DOI: 10.7326/M16-2891
Source:
Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Back to results list
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait
Searching for
in
scope:(TDTS),scope:(SFX),scope:(TDT),scope:(SEN),primo_central_multiple_fe
Show me what you have so far
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript