skip to main content
Ngôn ngữ:
Giới hạn tìm kiếm: Giới hạn tìm kiếm: Dạng tài nguyên Hiển thị kết quả với: Hiển thị kết quả với: Dạng tìm kiếm Chỉ mục

Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Neurology, 2016-02, Vol.86 (6), p.566-576 [Tạp chí có phản biện]

2016 American Academy of Neurology ;2016 American Academy of Neurology. ;ISSN: 0028-3878 ;EISSN: 1526-632X ;DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002350 ;PMID: 26764028

Tài liệu số/Tài liệu điện tử

Trích dẫn Trích dẫn bởi
  • Nhan đề:
    Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Tác giả: Rizzo, Giovanni ; Copetti, Massimiliano ; Arcuti, Simona ; Martino, Davide ; Fontana, Andrea ; Logroscino, Giancarlo
  • Chủ đề: Bayes Theorem ; Biomarkers - analysis ; Brain - physiopathology ; Early Diagnosis ; Humans ; Parkinson Disease - diagnosis
  • Là 1 phần của: Neurology, 2016-02, Vol.86 (6), p.566-576
  • Mô tả: OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of clinical diagnosis of Parkinson disease (PD) reported in the last 25 years by a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS:We searched for articles published between 1988 and August 2014. Studies were included if reporting diagnostic parameters regarding clinical diagnosis of PD or crude data. The selected studies were subclassified based on different study setting, type of test diagnosis, and gold standard. Bayesian meta-analyses of available data were performed. RESULTS:We selected 20 studies, including 11 using pathologic examination as gold standard. Considering only these 11 studies, the pooled diagnostic accuracy was 80.6% (95% credible interval [CrI] 75.2%–85.3%). Accuracy was 73.8% (95% CrI 67.8%–79.6%) for clinical diagnosis performed mainly by nonexperts. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis performed by movement disorders experts rose from 79.6% (95% CrI 46%–95.1%) of initial assessment to 83.9% (95% CrI 69.7%–92.6%) of refined diagnosis after follow-up. Using UK Parkinsonʼs Disease Society Brain Bank Research Center criteria, the pooled diagnostic accuracy was 82.7% (95% CrI 62.6%–93%). CONCLUSION:The overall validity of clinical diagnosis of PD is not satisfying. The accuracy did not significantly improve in the last 25 years, particularly in the early stages of disease, where response to dopaminergic treatment is less defined and hallmarks of alternative diagnoses such as atypical parkinsonism may not have emerged. Misclassification rate should be considered to calculate the sample size both in observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Imaging and biomarkers are urgently needed to improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis in vivo.
  • Nơi xuất bản: United States: American Academy of Neurology
  • Ngôn ngữ: English
  • Số nhận dạng: ISSN: 0028-3878
    EISSN: 1526-632X
    DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002350
    PMID: 26764028
  • Nguồn: MEDLINE
    Alma/SFX Local Collection
Trở lại danh sách kết quả
Về trang trướcTrước Kết quả  5 Tiếp theoTới trang tiếp theo
INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY (84-028) 37 755 057 Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn

Copyright © 2017 INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY

Đang tìm Cơ sở dữ liệu bên ngoài...