Language:

Did the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture Affect Trade Flows? An Empirical Investigation for Meat Commodities

International advances in economic research, 2010-11, Vol.16 (4), p.331-344 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

International Atlantic Economic Society 2010 ;COPYRIGHT 2010 Springer ;ISSN: 1083-0898 ;EISSN: 1573-966X ;DOI: 10.1007/s11294-010-9278-8

Full text available

Citations Cited by

Actions
1. Add to My Research
2. Remove from My Research
3. E-mail
4. Print
5. Permalink
6. Citation
7. EasyBib
8. EndNote
9. RefWorks
10. Delicious
11. Export RIS
12. Export BibTeX

Title:
Did the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture Affect Trade Flows? An Empirical Investigation for Meat Commodities
Author: Ghazalian, Pascal L ; Cardwell, Ryan
Subjects: Agribusiness ; Agricultural commodities ; Agricultural economics ; agricultural products ; Agriculture ; Developing countries ; Dynamic panel estimation ; Economic Growth ; Economic theory ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Expenditures ; Exports ; Farm produce ; International economic relations ; International Economics ; International trade ; LDCs ; Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics ; market access ; Meat ; Meat commodities ; Meat industry ; Microeconomics ; Most favored nation clause ; Studies ; Subsidies ; Success ; Tariffs ; trade ; Trade agreements ; Uruguay round agreement on agriculture
Is Part Of: International advances in economic research, 2010-11, Vol.16 (4), p.331-344
Description: The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture (URAA) was designed to reduce trade barriers and temper domestic and export policies that affect trade flows in agricultural commodities. This paper employs a dynamic framework to estimate the effects of the URAA on trade flows, as measured by export volumes, of three meat commodities. The model controls for several important factors, including regional trade agreements, and finds that the URAA had mixed effects on meat exports. Several complicating factors and policy responses, including increasing use of non-negotiated trade barriers, smaller export subsidies and domestic support, and limited effectiveness of market access provisions, explain the mixed empirical results.
Publisher: Boston: Boston : Springer US
Language: English
Identifier: ISSN: 1083-0898
EISSN: 1573-966X
DOI: 10.1007/s11294-010-9278-8
Source: Alma/SFX Local Collection
ProQuest Central

Back to results list


INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY	(84-028) 37 755 057	Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM	thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn	Feedback

Did the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture Affect Trade Flows? An Empirical Investigation for Meat Commodities

International Atlantic Economic Society 2010 ;COPYRIGHT 2010 Springer ;ISSN: 1083-0898 ;EISSN: 1573-966X ;DOI: 10.1007/s11294-010-9278-8

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait