skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

2 Embedding mistrust: an exploration of the emerging UK policy frameworks on alcohol and pregnancy

BMJ open, 2021-03, Vol.11 (Suppl 1), p.A1-A1 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. ;2021 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;ISSN: 2044-6055 ;EISSN: 2044-6055 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-QHRN.2

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    2 Embedding mistrust: an exploration of the emerging UK policy frameworks on alcohol and pregnancy
  • Author: Arkell, R ; Lee, E ; Murphy, C
  • Subjects: Alcohol ; Pregnancy ; Womens health
  • Is Part Of: BMJ open, 2021-03, Vol.11 (Suppl 1), p.A1-A1
  • Description: BackgroundDue to the social and medical preoccupation with consumption of alcohol during pregnancy, public health policy has steadily sought to influence and shape maternal behaviour through increasingly coercive means. Throughout the last decade a clear policy framework aimed at addressing alcohol consumption during pregnancy has emerged. While institutional responses began with a ‘simplified’ message through the Chief Medical Officer’s guidance of abstinence only, the precautionary principle has since been further operationalised, leading to the introduction of mandatory screening to enforce ‘guidance’.Aim/ObjectivesTo explore the influence of prevailing attitudes towards maternal alcohol consumption in the treatment of evidence within relevant policy; to highlight the implications for pregnant women.MethodsA document analysis, informed by socio-cultural theory, of the introduction of key policy documents; namely: UK Chief Medical Officers’ Low-Risk Alcohol Guidelines (2016), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) Guideline 156: Children and Young People Exposed Prenatally to Alcohol (2019), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Draft Quality Standards on FASD (2020).ResultsUsing a detailed exploration of ideas of risk, uncertainty and trust, we argue that policy documents, which facilitate action against any drinking in pregnancy, have relied upon the explicit removal of evidence relating to alcohol consumption and impaired foetal development from policy (SIGN 2019, NICE 2020), which legitimates the use of mandatory screening for alcohol under the guise of ‘routine antenatal care’. This transformation of guidance into mandate is hinged on a lack of trust in women’s ability to comprehend and act on the available evidence relating to alcohol consumption and harm.ConclusionsOur analysis highlights the importance of socio-cultural theory in understanding both the feasibility of actual and proposed policy responses to alcohol consumption during pregnancy, and the potential implications of this framework for women– including an erosion of trust in relationships with healthcare practitioners.
  • Publisher: London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 2044-6055
    EISSN: 2044-6055
    DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-QHRN.2
  • Source: ProQuest One Psychology
    BMJ Open Access Journals
    GFMER Free Medical Journals
    PubMed Central
    Coronavirus Research Database
    ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
    ProQuest Central
    DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait