skip to main content
Language:
Primo Advanced Search
Primo Advanced Search Query Term
Primo Advanced Search prefilters

Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2018-03, Vol.115 (11), p.2628-2631 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Volumes 1–89 and 106–114, copyright as a collective work only; author(s) retains copyright to individual articles ;ISSN: 0027-8424 ;EISSN: 1091-6490 ;DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1708272114

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?
  • Author: Fanelli, Daniele
  • Subjects: COLLOQUIUM OPINION
  • Is Part Of: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2018-03, Vol.115 (11), p.2628-2631
  • Description: Efforts to improve the reproducibility and integrity of science are typically justified by a narrative of crisis, according to which most published results are unreliable due to growing problems with research and publication practices. This article provides an overview of recent evidence suggesting that this narrative is mistaken, and argues that a narrative of epochal changes and empowerment of scientists would be more accurate, inspiring, and compelling.
  • Publisher: National Academy of Sciences
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 0027-8424
    EISSN: 1091-6490
    DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1708272114
  • Source: GFMER Free Medical Journals
    PubMed Central

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait