skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in adolescents: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial

Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.), 2021-01, Vol.46 (2), p.462-469 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2020. ;The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2020 ;ISSN: 0893-133X ;EISSN: 1740-634X ;DOI: 10.1038/s41386-020-00829-y ;PMID: 32919400

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in adolescents: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial
  • Author: Croarkin, Paul E ; Elmaadawi, Ahmed Z ; Aaronson, Scott T ; Schrodt, Jr, G Randolph ; Holbert, Richard C ; Verdoliva, Sarah ; Heart, Karen L ; Demitrack, Mark A ; Strawn, Jeffrey R
  • Subjects: Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Depression - therapy ; Depressive Disorder, Major - therapy ; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant - therapy ; Double-Blind Method ; Humans ; Magnetic fields ; Mental depression ; Prefrontal Cortex ; Remission ; Teenagers ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ; Treatment Outcome
  • Is Part Of: Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.), 2021-01, Vol.46 (2), p.462-469
  • Description: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is prevalent and associated with a substantial psychosocial burden and mortality. There are few prior studies of interventions for TRD in adolescents. This was the largest study to date examining the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of 10-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for adolescents with TRD. Adolescents with TRD (aged 12-21 years) were enrolled in a randomized, sham-controlled trial of TMS across 13 sites. Treatment resistance was defined as an antidepressant treatment record level of 1 to 4 in a current episode of depression. Intention-to-treat patients (n = 103) included those randomly assigned to active NeuroStar TMS monotherapy (n = 48) or sham TMS (n = 55) for 30 daily treatments over 6 weeks. The primary outcome measure was change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-24) score. After 6 weeks of blinded treatment, improvement in the least-squares mean (SE) HAM-D-24 scores were similar between the active (-11.1 [2.03]) and sham groups (-10.6 [2.00]; P = 0.8; difference [95% CI], - 0.5 [-4.2 to 3.3]). Response rates were 41.7% in the active group and 36.4% in the sham group (P = 0.6). Remission rates were 29.2% in the active group and 29.0% in the sham group (P = 0.95). There were no new tolerability or safety signals in adolescents. Although TMS treatment produced a clinically meaningful change in depressive symptom severity, this did not differ from sham treatment. Future studies should focus on strategies to reduce the placebo response and examine the optimal dosing of TMS for adolescents with TRD.
  • Publisher: England: Nature Publishing Group
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 0893-133X
    EISSN: 1740-634X
    DOI: 10.1038/s41386-020-00829-y
    PMID: 32919400
  • Source: ProQuest One Psychology
    GFMER Free Medical Journals
    MEDLINE
    PubMed Central
    ProQuest Central

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait