Language:

Comparing biomarker profiles of patients with heart failure: atrial fibrillation vs. sinus rhythm and reduced vs. preserved ejection fraction

European heart journal, 2018-11, Vol.39 (43), p.3867-3875 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

ISSN: 0195-668X ;EISSN: 1522-9645 ;DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy421 ;PMID: 30137304

Full text available

Citations Cited by

Actions
1. Add to My Research
2. Remove from My Research
3. E-mail
4. Print
5. Permalink
6. Citation
7. EasyBib
8. EndNote
9. RefWorks
10. Delicious
11. Export RIS
12. Export BibTeX

Title:
Comparing biomarker profiles of patients with heart failure: atrial fibrillation vs. sinus rhythm and reduced vs. preserved ejection fraction
Author: Santema, Bernadet T ; Kloosterman, Mariëlle ; Van Gelder, Isabelle C ; Mordi, Ify ; Lang, Chim C ; Lam, Carolyn S P ; Anker, Stefan D ; Cleland, John G ; Dickstein, Kenneth ; Filippatos, Gerasimos ; Van der Harst, Pim ; Hillege, Hans L ; Ter Maaten, Jozine M ; Metra, Marco ; Ng, Leong L ; Ponikowski, Piotr ; Samani, Nilesh J ; Van Veldhuisen, Dirk J ; Zwinderman, Aeilko H ; Zannad, Faiez ; Damman, Kevin ; Van der Meer, Peter ; Rienstra, Michiel ; Voors, Adriaan A
Subjects: Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Atrial Fibrillation - complications ; Atrial Fibrillation - epidemiology ; Biomarkers ; Electrocardiography ; Female ; Heart Failure - classification ; Heart Failure - complications ; Heart Failure - epidemiology ; Heart Failure - physiopathology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stroke Volume - physiology
Is Part Of: European heart journal, 2018-11, Vol.39 (43), p.3867-3875
Description: The clinical correlates and consequences of atrial fibrillation (AF) might be different between heart failure with reduced vs. preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF vs. HFpEF). Biomarkers may provide insights into underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of AF in these different heart failure (HF) phenotypes. We performed a retrospective analysis of the BIOlogy Study to TAilored Treatment in Chronic Heart Failure (BIOSTAT-CHF), which was an observational cohort. We studied 2152 patients with HFrEF [ejection fraction (EF < 40%)], of which 1419 were in sinus rhythm (SR) and 733 had AF. Another 524 patients with HFpEF (EF ≥50%) were studied, of which 286 in SR and 238 with AF. For the comparison of biomarker profiles, 92 cardiovascular risk markers were measured (Proseek® Olink Cardiovascular III panel). The circulating risk marker pattern observed in HFrEF was different than the pattern in HFpEF: in HFrEF, AF was associated with higher levels of 77 of 92 (84%) risk markers compared to SR; whereas in HFpEF, many more markers were higher in SR than in AF. Over a median follow-up of 21 months, AF was associated with increased mortality risk [multivariable hazard ratio (HR) of 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.48, P = 0.002]; there was no significant interaction between heart rhythm and EF group on outcome. In patients with HFrEF, the presence of AF was associated with a homogeneously elevated cardiovascular risk marker profile. In contrast, in patients with HFpEF, the presence of AF was associated with a more scattered risk marker profile, suggesting differences in underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of AF in these HF phenotypes.
Publisher: England
Language: English
Identifier: ISSN: 0195-668X
EISSN: 1522-9645
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy421
PMID: 30137304
Source: Geneva Foundation Free Medical Journals at publisher websites
MEDLINE
Alma/SFX Local Collection

Back to results list


INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY	(84-028) 37 755 057	Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM	thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn	Feedback

Comparing biomarker profiles of patients with heart failure: atrial fibrillation vs. sinus rhythm and reduced vs. preserved ejection fraction

ISSN: 0195-668X ;EISSN: 1522-9645 ;DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy421 ;PMID: 30137304

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait