skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

News media coverage of COVID-19 public health and policy information

Humanities & social sciences communications, 2021-09, Vol.8 (1), p.1-11, Article 220 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;ISSN: 2662-9992 ;EISSN: 2662-9992 ;DOI: 10.1057/s41599-021-00900-z

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    News media coverage of COVID-19 public health and policy information
  • Author: Mach, Katharine J. ; Salas Reyes, Raúl ; Pentz, Brian ; Taylor, Jennifer ; Costa, Clarissa A. ; Cruz, Sandip G. ; Thomas, Kerronia E. ; Arnott, James C. ; Donald, Rosalind ; Jagannathan, Kripa ; Kirchhoff, Christine J. ; Rosella, Laura C. ; Klenk, Nicole
  • Subjects: Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Disease transmission ; False information ; Health risk assessment ; Health risks ; News media ; Pandemics ; Public health
  • Is Part Of: Humanities & social sciences communications, 2021-09, Vol.8 (1), p.1-11, Article 220
  • Description: Abstract During a pandemic, news media play a crucial role in communicating public health and policy information. Traditional newspaper coverage is important amidst increasing disinformation, yet uncertainties make covering health risks and efforts to limit transmission difficult. This study assesses print and online newspaper coverage of the coronavirus disease COVID-19 for March 2020, when the global pandemic was declared, through August 2020 in three countries: Canada (with the lowest per-capita case and death rates during the study timeframe), the United Kingdom (with a pronounced early spike), and the United States (with persistently high rates). Tools previously validated for pandemic-related news records allow measurement of multiple indicators of scientific quality (i.e., reporting that reflects the state of scientific knowledge) and of sensationalism (i.e., strategies rendering news as more extraordinary than it really is). COVID-19 reporting had moderate scientific quality and low sensationalism across 1331 sampled articles in twelve newspapers spanning the political spectrums of the three countries. Newspapers oriented towards the populist-right had the lowest scientific quality in reporting, combined with very low sensationalism in some cases. Against a backdrop of world-leading disease rates, U.S. newspapers on the political left had more exposing coverage, e.g., focused on policy failures or misinformation, and more warning coverage, e.g., focused on the risks of the disease, compared to U.S. newspapers on the political right. Despite the generally assumed benefits of low sensationalism, pandemic-related coverage with low scientific quality that also failed to alert readers to public-health risks, misinformation, or policy failures may have exacerbated the public-health effects of the disease. Such complexities will likely remain central for both pandemic news media reporting and public-health strategies reliant upon it.
  • Publisher: London: Palgrave Macmillan
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 2662-9992
    EISSN: 2662-9992
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-021-00900-z
  • Source: Coronavirus Research Database
    ProQuest Central
    DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Back to results list
INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY (84-028) 37 755 057 Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn

Copyright © 2017 INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait