skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

A regulation and transaction cost perspective on the design of corporate law

European journal of law and economics, 2019-06, Vol.47 (3), p.407-433 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

The Author(s) 2019 ;European Journal of Law and Economics is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;ISSN: 0929-1261 ;ISSN: 1572-9990 ;EISSN: 1572-9990 ;DOI: 10.1007/s10657-019-09620-x

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    A regulation and transaction cost perspective on the design of corporate law
  • Author: Almlöf, Hanna ; Bjuggren, Per-Olof
  • Subjects: Commercial Law ; Contracts ; Corporate law ; Costs ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; European Integration ; Finance ; Law and Economics ; Legislation ; Public Finance ; Regulation ; Transaction costs
  • Is Part Of: European journal of law and economics, 2019-06, Vol.47 (3), p.407-433
  • Description: For the corporate business model to be successful, it is important to align the interests of those who control and finance the firm. Corporate law has here an important task to fulfill. It offers a legal framework that can facilitate parties to conclude mutually preferable agreements at low transaction costs. The purpose of this paper is to show how to design corporate law to fulfill this task and apply this knowledge to a Swedish case. A two-dimension model that simultaneously considers both the regulation intensity and the level of default of corporate law is presented. The earlier literature treats these dimensions separately. By adding a transaction cost perspective to our model, we assess different regulatory techniques and examine how the Swedish legislation can be amended to help corporations by offering a standard contract that lowers the transaction costs of contracting. This can be achieved if default rules or standards of opt-out character are combined with other regulatory techniques with lower transaction costs such as opt-in alternatives and menus. We also show how our model can be used in other studies as a tool to analyze the design of legal rules.
  • Publisher: New York: Springer US
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 0929-1261
    ISSN: 1572-9990
    EISSN: 1572-9990
    DOI: 10.1007/s10657-019-09620-x
  • Source: SWEPUB Freely available online
    Springer OA刊
    ProQuest Central

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait