skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

AFTER ADARAND: RE-PRIORITIZING RACE-CONSCIOUS PROGRAMS IN FEDERAL PROCUREMENT

Public contract law journal, 2024-01, Vol.53 (2), p.377-404 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

COPYRIGHT 2024 American Bar Association ;Copyright American Bar Association Winter 2024 ;ISSN: 0033-3441 ;EISSN: 2162-8181

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    AFTER ADARAND: RE-PRIORITIZING RACE-CONSCIOUS PROGRAMS IN FEDERAL PROCUREMENT
  • Author: Toledo, Katharine I
  • Subjects: Demographic aspects ; Equality before the law ; Government contracts ; Government purchasing ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Letting of contracts ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Minority business enterprises ; Minority set aside programs ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Public contracts ; Small and medium sized companies ; United States
  • Is Part Of: Public contract law journal, 2024-01, Vol.53 (2), p.377-404
  • Description: This Note seeks to understand whether, nearly thirty years after the Supreme Court's decision in Adarand Constructors v. Pena (1995), there exists a path forward for the reprioritization of racial diversity in federal procurement. First, this Note traces the history of race-conscious procurement programs. It begins with the 1953 passage of the Small Business Act and concludes with discussion of the paradigm shift away from pre-Adarand race-conscious procurement programs and recent federal court guidance on post-Adarand inheritor programs like the 8(a) Program. Second, this Note analyzes two different lines of cases concerning Equal Protection, including the landmark cases that form the basis of modern Equal Protection doctrine and the line of cases implicating affirmative action policies in education. Finally, this Note presents three novel constitutional arguments positing that race-conscious procurement programs may yet be constitutional under the Equal Protection Clause and provides substantive recommendations as to how such programs could be utilized constitutionally.
  • Publisher: Chicago: American Bar Association
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 0033-3441
    EISSN: 2162-8181
  • Source: ProQuest Central

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait