skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Comparison of self-reported dietary intakes from the Automated Self-Administered 24-h recall, 4-d food records, and food-frequency questionnaires against recovery biomarkers

The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2018-01, Vol.107 (1), p.80-93 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2018. 2018 ;Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2018. ;Copyright American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc. Jan 2018 ;ISSN: 0002-9165 ;EISSN: 1938-3207 ;DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqx002 ;PMID: 29381789

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Comparison of self-reported dietary intakes from the Automated Self-Administered 24-h recall, 4-d food records, and food-frequency questionnaires against recovery biomarkers
  • Author: Park, Yikyung ; Dodd, Kevin W ; Kipnis, Victor ; Thompson, Frances E ; Potischman, Nancy ; Schoeller, Dale A ; Baer, David J ; Midthune, Douglas ; Troiano, Richard P ; Bowles, Heather ; Subar, Amy F
  • Subjects: Aged ; Biomarkers ; Biomarkers - urine ; Body Mass Index ; Comparative analysis ; Data collection ; Diet ; Diet Records ; Dietary intake ; Energy intake ; Exercise ; Female ; Food ; Humans ; Male ; Men ; Mental Recall ; Middle Aged ; Nitrogen - urine ; Nutrients ; Nutrition ; Nutrition Assessment ; Original Research Communications ; Potassium ; Potassium - urine ; Recovery ; Self Report ; Sodium ; Sodium - urine ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Urine ; Women
  • Is Part Of: The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2018-01, Vol.107 (1), p.80-93
  • Description: ABSTRACT Background A limited number of studies have evaluated self-reported dietary intakes against objective recovery biomarkers. Objective The aim was to compare dietary intakes of multiple Automated Self-Administered 24-h recalls (ASA24s), 4-d food records (4DFRs), and food-frequency questionnaires (FFQs) against recovery biomarkers and to estimate the prevalence of under- and overreporting. Design Over 12 mo, 530 men and 545 women, aged 50–74 y, were asked to complete 6 ASA24s (2011 version), 2 unweighed 4DFRs, 2 FFQs, two 24-h urine collections (biomarkers for protein, potassium, and sodium intakes), and 1 administration of doubly labeled water (biomarker for energy intake). Absolute and density-based energy-adjusted nutrient intakes were calculated. The prevalence of under- and overreporting of self-report against biomarkers was estimated. Results Ninety-two percent of men and 87% of women completed ≥3 ASA24s (mean ASA24s completed: 5.4 and 5.1 for men and women, respectively). Absolute intakes of energy, protein, potassium, and sodium assessed by all self-reported instruments were systematically lower than those from recovery biomarkers, with underreporting greater for energy than for other nutrients. On average, compared with the energy biomarker, intake was underestimated by 15–17% on ASA24s, 18–21% on 4DFRs, and 29–34% on FFQs. Underreporting was more prevalent on FFQs than on ASA24s and 4DFRs and among obese individuals. Mean protein and sodium densities on ASA24s, 4DFRs, and FFQs were similar to biomarker values, but potassium density on FFQs was 26–40% higher, leading to a substantial increase in the prevalence of overreporting compared with absolute potassium intake. Conclusions Although misreporting is present in all self-report dietary assessment tools, multiple ASA24s and a 4DFR provided the best estimates of absolute dietary intakes for these few nutrients and outperformed FFQs. Energy adjustment improved estimates from FFQs for protein and sodium but not for potassium. The ASA24, which now can be used to collect both recalls and records, is a feasible means to collect dietary data for nutrition research.
  • Publisher: United States: Oxford University Press
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 0002-9165
    EISSN: 1938-3207
    DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqx002
    PMID: 29381789
  • Source: GFMER Free Medical Journals
    MEDLINE
    Alma/SFX Local Collection
Back to results list
INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY (84-028) 37 755 057 Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn

Copyright © 2017 INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait