skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Effects of Different Additives on the Chemical Composition, Fermentation Profile, In Vitro and In Situ Digestibility of Paper mulberry Silage

Fermentation (Basel), 2022-09, Vol.8 (9), p.435 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG ;2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;ISSN: 2311-5637 ;EISSN: 2311-5637 ;DOI: 10.3390/fermentation8090435

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Effects of Different Additives on the Chemical Composition, Fermentation Profile, In Vitro and In Situ Digestibility of Paper mulberry Silage
  • Author: Wang, Wei ; Hao, Yangyi ; Luo, Chenglong ; Wang, Qianqian ; Wang, Zhonghan ; Li, Dong ; Yuan, Jing ; Cao, Zhijun ; Yang, Hongjian ; Li, Shengli
  • Subjects: Additives ; Ammonia ; Broussonetia papyrifera ; Butyric acid ; Chemical composition ; Chemical properties ; Composition ; Digestibility ; Dry matter ; Fermentation ; in situ digestibility ; in vitro digestibility ; Laboratory animals ; Lactic acid bacteria ; Lactobacillus plantarum ; Molasses ; Mulberry ; Nitrogen ; paper mulberry silage ; Proteins ; Silage ; Syrups & sweeteners
  • Is Part Of: Fermentation (Basel), 2022-09, Vol.8 (9), p.435
  • Description: Paper mulberry (Broussonetia papyrifera) plants are served as a local roughage in China, and they are mostly processed as silage for ruminants. This study aimed to explore the effects of different silage additives on the chemical composition, fermentation profile, as well as the in vitro and in situ digestibility of paper mulberry (PM) silage. Four groups consisting of PM silage, three with additives and one without any additives as the control group (CON), were established. The three experimental groups with additives were set up as follows: CON with 5 × 106 CFU per gram of fresh PM weight of lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus plantarum) (LAB); CON with 3% fresh PM weight of molasses (MOL) added to the PM silage; and CON with both LAB and MOL added (LM). After 45 days of ensiling at 20 °C, all of the PM treatment groups increased their ash content and decreased their water-soluble carbohydrate content (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the pH and NH3-N content of the PM silage were lower in the additive treatment groups than in the CON group (p < 0.05). Lactic acid in the LM group was the highest (p < 0.05) among the four groups, and trace amounts of butyric acid was detected only in the CON group. In vitro dry matter digestibility was similar among all groups. Results of the in situ experiment found that the effective digestibility of the PM silage dry matter, as well as the acid detergent fiber digestibility was higher in the LM group than in the CON group (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the addition of LAB, MOL, and their combination can improve PM silage fermentation and improve the in situ digestibility of dry matter and acid detergent fiber; however they do not affect in the vitro digestibility of PM silage.
  • Publisher: Basel: MDPI AG
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 2311-5637
    EISSN: 2311-5637
    DOI: 10.3390/fermentation8090435
  • Source: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
    ProQuest Central
    DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait