skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Wide range of applications for machine-learning prediction models in orthopedic surgical outcome: a systematic review

Acta orthopaedica, 2021-10, Vol.92 (5), p.526-531 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

2021 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation. 2021 ;2021 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation. 2021 The Author(s) ;ISSN: 1745-3674 ;EISSN: 1745-3682 ;DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1932928 ;PMID: 34109892

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Wide range of applications for machine-learning prediction models in orthopedic surgical outcome: a systematic review
  • Author: Ogink, Paul T ; Groot, Olivier Q ; Karhade, Aditya V ; Bongers, Michiel E R ; Oner, F Cumhur ; Verlaan, Jorrit-Jan ; Schwab, Joseph H
  • Is Part Of: Acta orthopaedica, 2021-10, Vol.92 (5), p.526-531
  • Description: Background and purpose - Advancements in software and hardware have enabled the rise of clinical prediction models based on machine learning (ML) in orthopedic surgery. Given their growing popularity and their likely implementation in clinical practice we evaluated which outcomes these new models have focused on and what methodologies are being employed. Material and methods - We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies published up to June 18, 2020. Studies reporting on non-ML prediction models or non-orthopedic outcomes were excluded. After screening 7,138 studies, 59 studies reporting on 77 prediction models were included. We extracted data regarding outcome, study design, and reported performance metrics. Results - Of the 77 identified ML prediction models the most commonly reported outcome domain was medical management (17/77). Spinal surgery was the most commonly involved orthopedic subspecialty (28/77). The most frequently employed algorithm was neural networks (42/77). Median size of datasets was 5,507 (IQR 635-26,364). The median area under the curve (AUC) was 0.80 (IQR 0.73-0.86). Calibration was reported for 26 of the models and 14 provided decision-curve analysis. Interpretation - ML prediction models have been developed for a wide variety of topics in orthopedics. Topics regarding medical management were the most commonly studied. Heterogeneity between studies is based on study size, algorithm, and time-point of outcome. Calibration and decision-curve analysis were generally poorly reported.
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 1745-3674
    EISSN: 1745-3682
    DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1932928
    PMID: 34109892
  • Source: Taylor & Francis Open Access
    GFMER Free Medical Journals
    PubMed Central
    Alma/SFX Local Collection
    DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Back to results list
INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY (84-028) 37 755 057 Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn

Copyright © 2017 INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait