skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Responsible Leadership and the Reflective CEO: Resolving Stakeholder Conflict by Imagining What Could be done

Journal of business ethics, 2022-09, Vol.180 (1), p.313-337 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

The Author(s) 2021 ;The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;ISSN: 0167-4544 ;EISSN: 1573-0697 ;DOI: 10.1007/s10551-021-04865-6 ;PMID: 34177017

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Responsible Leadership and the Reflective CEO: Resolving Stakeholder Conflict by Imagining What Could be done
  • Author: Pless, Nicola M. ; Sengupta, Atri ; Wheeler, Melissa A. ; Maak, Thomas
  • Subjects: Approaches ; Business and Management ; Business Ethics ; Case studies ; Conflict ; Corruption in government ; COVID-19 ; Education ; Emerging markets ; Ethics ; Imagination ; Indigenous peoples ; Integrative approach ; Leadership ; Management ; Markets ; Moral dilemmas ; Moral judgment ; Original Paper ; Pandemics ; Philosophy ; Quality of Life Research ; Rural communities ; Single case studies ; Stakeholders
  • Is Part Of: Journal of business ethics, 2022-09, Vol.180 (1), p.313-337
  • Description: In light of grand societal challenges, most recently the global Covid-19 pandemic, there is a call for research on responsible leadership. While significant advances have been made in recent years towards a better understanding of the concept, a gap exists in the understanding of responsible leadership in emerging countries, specifically how leaders resolve prevalent moral dilemmas. Following Werhane (1999), we use moral imagination as an analytical approach to analyze a dilemmatic stakeholder conflict (between indigenous communities in rural India and an emerging market multinational enterprise headquartered in the same country) through the lense of different responsible leadership mindsets and in light of different ethical principles and moral background theories. Based on this analysis, we arrive at a tentative moral judgement, concluding that the instrumental approach is morally inferior and recommending the integrative approach as the morally superior choice . In the subsequent discussion—focussed on what “could” (instead of “should”) be done, we apply the integrative script and use moral imagination as a pathway for generating morally justifiable solutions. Through this analysis, we provide novel insights on how to apply an integrative responsible leadership approach to a stakeholder conflict situation, using the single case study to expand the responsible leadership discussion to emerging markets.
  • Publisher: Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 0167-4544
    EISSN: 1573-0697
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-021-04865-6
    PMID: 34177017
  • Source: ProQuest One Psychology
    SpringerOpen
    ProQuest Central

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait