skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey

BMJ, 2011-10, Vol.343 (7835), p.1192-1192 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Wislar et al 2011 ;BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2011 ;Copyright: 2011 © Wislar et al 2011 ;Wislar et al 2011 2011 Wislar et al ;ISSN: 0959-8138 ;ISSN: 0959-8146 ;EISSN: 1468-5833 ;EISSN: 1756-1833 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d6128 ;PMID: 22028479 ;CODEN: BMJOAE

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey
  • Author: Wislar, Joseph S ; Flanagin, Annette ; Fontanarosa, Phil B ; DeAngelis, Catherine D
  • Subjects: Authors ; Authorship ; Authorship attribution ; Bibliometrics ; Biomedical research ; Congressional committees ; Cross sectional studies ; Editorial Policies ; Editorials ; Ethics ; Ghosts ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Journalology ; Medical journals ; Medicine ; Participation ; Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data ; Periodicals as Topic - trends ; Public officials ; Publishing - statistics & numerical data ; Publishing - trends ; Questionnaires ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Writers ; Writing
  • Is Part Of: BMJ, 2011-10, Vol.343 (7835), p.1192-1192
  • Description: Objectives To assess the prevalence of honorary and ghost authors in six leading general medical journals in 2008 and compare this with the prevalence reported by authors of articles published in 1996.Design Cross sectional survey using a web based questionnaire.Setting International survey of journal authors.Participants Sample of corresponding authors of 896 research articles, review articles, and editorial/opinion articles published in six general medical journals with high impact factors in 2008: Annals of Internal Medicine, JAMA, Lancet, Nature Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine, and PLoS Medicine.Main outcome measures Self reported compliance with International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for all authors on the selected articles.Results A total of 630/896 (70.3%) corresponding authors responded to the survey. The prevalence of articles with honorary authorship or ghost authorship, or both, was 21.0% (95% CI 18.0% to 24.3%), a decrease from 29.2% reported in 1996 (P=0.004). Based on 545 responses on honorary authorship, 96 articles (17.6% (95% CI 14.6% to 21.0%)) had honorary authors (range by journal 12.2% to 29.3%), a non-significant change from 1996 (19.3%; P=0.439). Based on 622 responses on ghost authorship, 49 articles (7.9% (6.0% to 10.3%)) had ghost authors (range by journal 2.1% to 11.0%), a significant decline from 1996 (11.5%; P=0.023). The prevalence of honorary authorship was 25.0% in original research reports, 15.0% in reviews, and 11.2% in editorials, whereas the prevalence of ghost authorship was 11.9% in research articles, 6.0% in reviews, and 5.3% in editorials.Conclusions Evidence of honorary and ghost authorship in 21% of articles published in major medical journals in 2008 suggests that increased efforts by scientific journals, individual authors, and academic institutions are essential to promote responsibility, accountability, and transparency in authorship, and to maintain integrity in scientific publication.
  • Publisher: England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 0959-8138
    ISSN: 0959-8146
    EISSN: 1468-5833
    EISSN: 1756-1833
    DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d6128
    PMID: 22028479
    CODEN: BMJOAE
  • Source: BMJ Open Access Journals
    MEDLINE
    Alma/SFX Local Collection
    ProQuest Central
Back to results list
INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY (84-028) 37 755 057 Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn

Copyright © 2017 INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait