skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Criteria Analysis, weight and Priority for Handling Bridges in Kudus District using AHP and Promethee II methods

Journal of physics. Conference series, 2019-02, Vol.1167 (1), p.12009 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd ;2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;ISSN: 1742-6588 ;EISSN: 1742-6596 ;DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1167/1/012009

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Criteria Analysis, weight and Priority for Handling Bridges in Kudus District using AHP and Promethee II methods
  • Author: Prasetyo, E D W ; Handajani, Mudjiastuti ; Ismiyati
  • Subjects: Bridge maintenance ; Criteria ; Damage ; Handling ; Public works ; Weighting
  • Is Part Of: Journal of physics. Conference series, 2019-02, Vol.1167 (1), p.12009
  • Description: To determine the criteria for selecting bridges, the ideal support method was required to assist the decision makers. This study was based in the Kudus district and the object of this research was 20 proposals from the Public Works Office for the 2019 bridge handling. From the visual assessment: severe bridge damage (10 bridges), minor bridge damage (3 bridges), medium bridge damage (6 bridges) and bridges in good condition (1 bridge). An imbalance exists between the bridges that need to be maintained and the capacity that can. Depend on existing data, the objective of this study is to analyze the ideal weight main criteria and priority for handling the bridge using the AHP and Promethee II method. A total of 10 respondents were involved in assessing the criteria for The AHP method. A more consistent weighting criteria were produced with a value of 0.31, the ADT weight was 0.19, the number of public and social facilities weight was 0.12, the population weight was 0.15, the area weight was 0.05, the bridge length weight was 0.05, and the bridge width weight was 0.13. The weight of the ideal main criteria is approximately 0.40. Furthermore, the Promethee II method makes the process of priority weighting more dynamic and easier by reducing questionnaire from the AHP method. The main priority was the 8 severely damaged. The highest weight priority was the Klaling - Tanjungrejo 05 bridge.
  • Publisher: Bristol: IOP Publishing
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 1742-6588
    EISSN: 1742-6596
    DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1167/1/012009
  • Source: Geneva Foundation Free Medical Journals at publisher websites
    IOPscience (Open Access)
    Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles
    ProQuest Central
Back to results list
INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY (84-028) 37 755 057 Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn

Copyright © 2017 INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait