Language:

A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting

BMC health services research, 2013-06, Vol.13 (1), p.211-211, Article 211 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd. ;2013 Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ;Copyright © 2013 Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. ;ISSN: 1472-6963 ;EISSN: 1472-6963 ;DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-211 ;PMID: 23758898

Full text available

Citations Cited by

Actions
1. Add to My Research
2. Remove from My Research
3. E-mail
4. Print
5. Permalink
6. Citation
7. EasyBib
8. EndNote
9. RefWorks
10. Delicious
11. Export RIS
12. Export BibTeX

Title:
A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting
Author: Chen, Jack ; Ou, Lixin ; Hollis, Stephanie J
Subjects: Analysis ; Cancer ; Cancer patients ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical trials ; Evidence-based medicine ; Evidence-Based Medicine - organization & administration ; Humans ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Outcome and process assessment (Health Care) ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Patient outcomes ; Patient safety ; Patient Satisfaction ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Qualitative Research ; Quality Indicators, Health Care ; Quality of life ; Researchers ; Self Report ; Systematic review ; Treatment Outcome
Is Part Of: BMC health services research, 2013-06, Vol.13 (1), p.211-211, Article 211
Description: Despite growing interest and urges by leading experts for the routine collection of patient reported outcome (PRO) measures in all general care patients, and in particular cancer patients, there has not been an updated comprehensive review of the evidence regarding the impact of adopting such a strategy on patients, service providers and organisations in an oncologic setting. Based on a critical analysis of the three most recent systematic reviews, the current systematic review developed a six-method strategy in searching and reviewing the most relevant quantitative studies between January 2000 and October 2011 using a set of pre-determined inclusion criteria and theory-based outcome indicators. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to rate the quality and importance of the identified publications, and the synthesis of the evidence was conducted. The 27 identified studies showed strong evidence that the well-implemented PROs improved patient-provider communication and patient satisfaction. There was also growing evidence that it improved the monitoring of treatment response and the detection of unrecognised problems. However, there was a weak or non-existent evidence-base regarding the impact on changes to patient management and improved health outcomes, changes to patient health behaviour, the effectiveness of quality improvement of organisations, and on transparency, accountability, public reporting activities, and performance of the health care system. Despite the existence of significant gaps in the evidence-base, there is growing evidence in support of routine PRO collection in enabling better and patient-centred care in cancer settings.
Publisher: England: BioMed Central Ltd
Language: English
Identifier: ISSN: 1472-6963
EISSN: 1472-6963
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-211
PMID: 23758898
Source: Open Access: PubMed Central
SpringerOpen
Geneva Foundation Free Medical Journals at publisher websites
AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central
MEDLINE
Directory of Open Access Journals
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources

Back to results list


INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY	(84-028) 37 755 057	Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM	thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn	Feedback

A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait