skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI

Journal of medical ethics, 2021-05, Vol.47 (5), p.329-335 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. ;2021 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. ;ISSN: 0306-6800 ;EISSN: 1473-4257 ;DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106820 ;PMID: 33737318

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI
  • Author: Durán, Juan Manuel ; Jongsma, Karin Rolanda
  • Subjects: Algorithms ; Artificial intelligence ; Bioethics ; Clinical decision making ; Decision making ; Epistemology ; Ethics ; Medical practices ; Medicine ; Skin cancer ; Trust
  • Is Part Of: Journal of medical ethics, 2021-05, Vol.47 (5), p.329-335
  • Description: The use of black box algorithms in medicine has raised scholarly concerns due to their opaqueness and lack of trustworthiness. Concerns about potential bias, accountability and responsibility, patient autonomy and compromised trust transpire with black box algorithms. These worries connect epistemic concerns with normative issues. In this paper, we outline that black box algorithms are less problematic for epistemic reasons than many scholars seem to believe. By outlining that more transparency in algorithms is not always necessary, and by explaining that computational processes are indeed methodologically opaque to humans, we argue that the reliability of algorithms provides reasons for trusting the outcomes of medical artificial intelligence (AI). To this end, we explain how computational reliabilism, which does not require transparency and supports the reliability of algorithms, justifies the belief that results of medical AI are to be trusted. We also argue that several ethical concerns remain with black box algorithms, even when the results are trustworthy. Having justified knowledge from reliable indicators is, therefore, necessary but not sufficient for normatively justifying physicians to act. This means that deliberation about the results of reliable algorithms is required to find out what is a desirable action. Thus understood, we argue that such challenges should not dismiss the use of black box algorithms altogether but should inform the way in which these algorithms are designed and implemented. When physicians are trained to acquire the necessary skills and expertise, and collaborate with medical informatics and data scientists, black box algorithms can contribute to improving medical care.
  • Publisher: England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 0306-6800
    EISSN: 1473-4257
    DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106820
    PMID: 33737318
  • Source: AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central
Back to results list
INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY (84-028) 37 755 057 Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn

Copyright © 2017 INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait