skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

An attempt at clarifying Maximus the Confesor’s remarks on (the fate of) sexual difference in Ambiguum 41

Filozofija i društvo (Zbornik radova), 2021, Vol.32 (2), p.194-203 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

ISSN: 0353-5738 ;EISSN: 2334-8577 ;DOI: 10.2298/FID2102194M

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    An attempt at clarifying Maximus the Confesor’s remarks on (the fate of) sexual difference in Ambiguum 41
  • Author: Mitralexis, Sotiris
  • Subjects: body ; female ; gender ; male ; maximus the confessor ; nature ; sexual difference
  • Is Part Of: Filozofija i društvo (Zbornik radova), 2021, Vol.32 (2), p.194-203
  • Description: Maximus the Confessor?s Ambiguum 41 contains some rather atypical observations concerning the distinction of sexes in the human person. There is a certain ambiguity as to whether the distinction of the sexes was intended by God and is ?by nature? (as found in Genesis and asserted by most Church Fathers) or a product of the Fall. Namely, Christ is described three times as ?shaking out of nature the distinctive characteristics of male and female?, ?driving out of nature the difference and division of male and female? and ?removing the difference between male and female?. Different readings of those passages engender important implications that can be drawn out from the Confessor?s thought, both eschatological implications and otherwise. The subject has been picked up by Cameron Partridge, Doru Costache and Karolina Kochanczyk-Boninska, among others, but is by no means settled, as they draw quite different conclusions. The noteworthy and far-reaching implications of Maximus? theological stance and problems are not the object of this paper. In a 2017 paper I attempted to demonstrate what Maximus exactly says in these peculiar and oft-commented passages through a close reading, in order to avoid a two-edged Maximian misunderstanding: to either draw overly radical implications from those passages, projecting decidedly non-Maximian visions on the historical Maximus, or none at all, as if those passages represented standard Patristic positions. Here, I am revisiting this argument, given that the interest in what the Confessor has to say on the subject seems to be increasing.
  • Publisher: Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade
  • Language: Serbian;German
  • Identifier: ISSN: 0353-5738
    EISSN: 2334-8577
    DOI: 10.2298/FID2102194M
  • Source: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Back to results list
INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY (84-028) 37 755 057 Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn

Copyright © 2017 INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait