skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Transparency's Ideological Drift

The Yale law journal, 2018-10, Vol.128 (1), p.100-165

Copyright © 2018 The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc. ;COPYRIGHT 2018 Yale University, School of Law ;COPYRIGHT 2018 Yale University, School of Law ;Copyright Yale Law Journal Company, Inc. Oct 2018 ;ISSN: 0044-0094 ;EISSN: 1939-8611

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Transparency's Ideological Drift
  • Author: POZEN, DAVID E.
  • Subjects: Access control ; Accountability ; Ambivalence ; Analysis ; Bureaucracy ; Disclosure ; Egalitarianism ; FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ; GOVERNMENT ; Government information ; GOVERNMENT POLICY ; Ideology ; Influence ; International trade ; Legitimacy ; Libertarianism ; National security ; Neoliberalism ; Openness ; Political aspects ; Political ideologies ; POLITICAL PARTIES ; Progressivism ; Progressivism (United States politics) ; Rationality ; Secrecy ; Social justice ; Transparency ; Transparency in government
  • Is Part Of: The Yale law journal, 2018-10, Vol.128 (1), p.100-165
  • Description: In the formative periods of American "open government" law, the idea of transparency was linked with progressive politics. Advocates of transparency understood themselves to be promoting values such as bureaucratic rationality, social justice, and trust in public institutions. Transparency was meant to make government stronger and more egalitarian. In the twenty-first century, transparency is doing different work. Although a wide range of actors appeal to transparency in a wide range of contexts, the dominant strain in the policy discourse emphasizes its capacity to check administrative abuse, enhance private choice, and reduce other forms of regulation. Transparency is meant to make government smaller and less egregious. This Article traces transparency's drift in the United States from a progressive to a more libertarian, or neoliberal, orientation and offers some reflections on the causes and consequences — and on the possibility of a reversal. Many factors have played a part, including corporate capture of freedom of information laws, the exponential growth in national security secrecy, the emergence of the digital age and associated technologies of disclosure, the desire to facilitate international trade and investment, and the ascendance of market-based theories of regulation. Perhaps the most fundamental driver of this ideological drift, however, is the most easily overlooked: the diminishing marginal returns to government transparency. As public institutions became subject to more and more policies of openness and accountability, demands for transparency became more and more threatening to the functioning and legitimacy of those institutions and, consequently, to progressive political agendas. Coming to terms with transparency law's ambivalent legacy is the first step toward redeeming its promise in the present day.
  • Publisher: New Haven: The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 0044-0094
    EISSN: 1939-8611
  • Source: Freely Accessible Journals
Back to results list
INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY (84-028) 37 755 057 Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn

Copyright © 2017 INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait