skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Genetic information, discrimination, philosophical pluralism and politics

Journal of medical ethics, 2021-07, Vol.47 (7), p.480-481 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. ;2021 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. ;info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ;ISSN: 0306-6800 ;EISSN: 1473-4257 ;DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107539 ;PMID: 34099543

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Genetic information, discrimination, philosophical pluralism and politics
  • Author: Holm, Søren
  • Subjects: Consequentialism ; Disability insurance ; Ethics ; Genomics ; Human rights ; Insurance industry ; Medical ethics ; Underwriting
  • Is Part Of: Journal of medical ethics, 2021-07, Vol.47 (7), p.480-481
  • Description: Correspondence to Professor Søren Holm, Department of Law, The University of Manchester, Manchester, Manchester, UK; soren.holm@manchester.ac.uk In the paper ‘Genetic information, insurance, and a pluralistic approach to justice’, Jonathan Pugh1 develops an argument from unresolved pluralism in our theories of justice, via the pluralism this occasions in relation to the specific question of the use of genetic test results (GTRs) in insurance underwriting, to the conclusion that the UK regulatory approach in relation to the use of GTRs in insurance is broadly correct.1 Pugh’s argument is wide-ranging and I cannot provide a complete critique of it in this short comment, but I will gesture towards some strands of the argument that are potentially problematic. Article 12 of the Convention prohibits predictive genetic testing that is not ‘for health purposes or for scientific research linked to health purpose’, and Article 11 states that ‘Any form of discrimination against a person on grounds of his or her genetic heritage is prohibited.’ 4 Nill A, Laczniak G, Thistle P. The use of genetic testing information in the insurance industry: an ethical and societal analysis of public policy options.
  • Publisher: England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD
  • Language: English;Norwegian
  • Identifier: ISSN: 0306-6800
    EISSN: 1473-4257
    DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107539
    PMID: 34099543
  • Source: NORA Norwegian Open Research Archives
    ProQuest Central

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait