skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Affect fluctuations examined with ecological momentary assessment in patients with current or remitted depression and anxiety disorders

Psychological medicine, 2021-08, Vol.51 (11), p.1906-1915 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Copyright © The Author(s), 2020 ;Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;The Author(s) 2020 2020 The Author(s) ;ISSN: 0033-2917 ;EISSN: 1469-8978 ;DOI: 10.1017/S0033291720000689 ;PMID: 32234092

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Affect fluctuations examined with ecological momentary assessment in patients with current or remitted depression and anxiety disorders
  • Author: Schoevers, R. A. ; van Borkulo, C. D. ; Lamers, F. ; Servaas, M.N. ; Bastiaansen, J. A. ; Beekman, A. T. F. ; van Hemert, A. M. ; Smit, J. H. ; Penninx, B. W. J. H. ; Riese, H.
  • Subjects: Affect ; Anxiety ; Anxiety disorders ; Anxiety Disorders - psychology ; Depressive Disorder - psychology ; Ecological Momentary Assessment ; Emotional regulation ; Emotions ; Female ; Humans ; Instability ; Male ; Mental depression ; Middle Aged ; Negative affect ; Negative affectivity ; Netherlands ; Original ; Original Article ; Positive affect ; Smartphones ; Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Is Part Of: Psychological medicine, 2021-08, Vol.51 (11), p.1906-1915
  • Description: There is increasing interest in day-to-day affect fluctuations of patients with depressive and anxiety disorders. Few studies have compared repeated assessments of positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA) across diagnostic groups, and fluctuation patterns were not uniformly defined. The aim of this study is to compare affect fluctuations in patients with a current episode of depressive or anxiety disorder, in remitted patients and in controls, using affect instability as a core concept but also describing other measures of variability and adjusting for possible confounders. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data were obtained from 365 participants of the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety with current (n = 95), remitted (n = 178) or no (n = 92) DSM-IV defined depression/anxiety disorder. For 2 weeks, five times per day, participants filled-out items on PA and NA. Affect instability was calculated as the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD). Tests on group differences in RMSSD, within-person variance, and autocorrelation were performed, controlling for mean affect levels. Current depression/anxiety patients had the highest affect instability in both PA and NA, followed by remitters and then controls. Instability differences between groups remained significant when controlling for mean affect levels, but differences between current and remitted were no longer significant. Patients with a current disorder have higher instability of NA and PA than remitted patients and controls. Especially with regard to NA, this could be interpreted as patients with a current disorder being more sensitive to internal and external stressors and having suboptimal affect regulation.
  • Publisher: Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 0033-2917
    EISSN: 1469-8978
    DOI: 10.1017/S0033291720000689
    PMID: 32234092
  • Source: ProQuest One Psychology
    MEDLINE
    ProQuest Central

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait