skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance

The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2013-12, Vol.36 (6), p.661-679 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 ;Cambridge University Press 2012 2012 ;ISSN: 0140-525X ;EISSN: 1469-1825 ;DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12003196 ;PMID: 24304775

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance
  • Author: Kurzban, Robert ; Duckworth, Angela ; Kable, Joseph W. ; Myers, Justus
  • Subjects: Computational neuroscience ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Costs ; Executive function ; Humans ; Mental Fatigue - psychology ; Models, Psychological ; Nervous system ; Opportunity costs ; Phenomenology ; Psychomotor Performance ; Target Article
  • Is Part Of: The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2013-12, Vol.36 (6), p.661-679
  • Description: Why does performing certain tasks cause the aversive experience of mental effort and concomitant deterioration in task performance? One explanation posits a physical resource that is depleted over time. We propose an alternative explanation that centers on mental representations of the costs and benefits associated with task performance. Specifically, certain computational mechanisms, especially those associated with executive function, can be deployed for only a limited number of simultaneous tasks at any given moment. Consequently, the deployment of these computational mechanisms carries an opportunity cost – that is, the next-best use to which these systems might be put. We argue that the phenomenology of effort can be understood as the felt output of these cost/benefit computations. In turn, the subjective experience of effort motivates reduced deployment of these computational mechanisms in the service of the present task. These opportunity cost representations, then, together with other cost/benefit calculations, determine effort expended and, everything else equal, result in performance reductions. In making our case for this position, we review alternative explanations for both the phenomenology of effort associated with these tasks and for performance reductions over time. Likewise, we review the broad range of relevant empirical results from across sub-disciplines, especially psychology and neuroscience. We hope that our proposal will help to build links among the diverse fields that have been addressing similar questions from different perspectives, and we emphasize ways in which alternative models might be empirically distinguished.
  • Publisher: New York, USA: Cambridge University Press
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 0140-525X
    EISSN: 1469-1825
    DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12003196
    PMID: 24304775
  • Source: ProQuest One Psychology
    MEDLINE
    ProQuest Central

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait