skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Why do Chinese students out-perform those from the West? Do approaches to learning contribute to the explanation?

Cogent education, 2016-01, Vol.3 (1), p.1248187 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

2016 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license 2016 ;2016 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. ;ISSN: 2331-186X ;EISSN: 2331-186X ;DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2016.1248187

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Why do Chinese students out-perform those from the West? Do approaches to learning contribute to the explanation?
  • Author: Kember, David
  • Danping, Wang
  • Subjects: Academic Achievement ; Achievement Gap ; approaches to learning ; Asian students ; Chinese learner ; Comparative Analysis ; Comparative Education ; comparative testing ; Cross Cultural Studies ; Evidence ; Factor Structure ; Foreign Countries ; Learning ; Learning Strategies ; memorisation ; Memorization ; Pedagogy ; PISA ; Qualitative Research ; Statistical Analysis ; understanding
  • Is Part Of: Cogent education, 2016-01, Vol.3 (1), p.1248187
  • Description: One of the major current issues in education is the question of why Chinese and East Asian students are outperforming those from Western countries. Research into the approaches to learning of Chinese students revealed the existence of intermediate approaches, combining memorising and understanding, which were distinct from rote learning. At the time, research into the paradox of the Chinese learner was content to establish that the approaches were not consistent with a surface approach and there was, therefore, no reason to anticipate the inferior learning outcomes associated with the approach. This article takes the analysis further to discuss whether the intermediate approaches could be advantageous for academic performance and could contribute to the superior performance, especially in mathematics, of Chinese students. Learning approaches are re-formulated as a continuum between pure surface and deep poles characterised by the presence of understanding and memorisation in the intention and strategy and in the sequence of their use. Evidence is presented of more frequent use by East Asian students of the approaches in the centre of the continuum which make the most use of meaningful memorisation, particularly when it precedes understanding. It is, therefore, possible that East Asian students are more likely to have memorised a knowledge base which enables them to perform better in comparative testing.
  • Publisher: Abingdon: Cogent
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 2331-186X
    EISSN: 2331-186X
    DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2016.1248187
  • Source: Open Access: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
    Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)
    Taylor & Francis Open Access Journals
    ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
    ProQuest Central

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait