skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Statistics and Probability Have Always Been Value-Laden: An Historical Ontology of Quantitative Research Methods

Journal of business ethics, 2020-11, Vol.167 (1), p.1-18 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Springer Nature B.V. 2020 ;Springer Nature B.V. 2019 ;Journal of Business Ethics is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. ;Springer Nature B.V. 2019. ;ISSN: 0167-4544 ;EISSN: 1573-0697 ;DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04187-8

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Statistics and Probability Have Always Been Value-Laden: An Historical Ontology of Quantitative Research Methods
  • Author: Zyphur, Michael J. ; Pierides, Dean C.
  • Subjects: 17th century ; Best practice ; Business and Management ; Business Ethics ; Conceptualization ; Discourses ; Education ; Ethics ; Historical analysis ; Management ; Morality ; Objectivity ; Ontology ; Original Paper ; Philosophy ; Probability ; Quality of Life Research ; Quantitative analysis ; Research ethics ; Research methodology ; Researchers ; Statistics ; Truth ; Utilitarianism ; Values ; Virtue ethics
  • Is Part Of: Journal of business ethics, 2020-11, Vol.167 (1), p.1-18
  • Description: Quantitative researchers often discuss research ethics as if specific ethical problems can be reduced to abstract normative logics (e.g., virtue ethics, utilitarianism, deontology). Such approaches overlook how values are embedded in every aspect of quantitative methods, including 'observations,' 'facts,' and notions of 'Objectivity.' We describe how quantitative research practices, concepts, discourses, and their objects/subjects of study have always been value-laden, from the invention of statistics and probability in the 1600s to their subsequent adoption as a logic made to appear as if it exists prior to, and separate from, ethics and values. This logic, which was embraced in the Academy of Management from the 1960s, casts management researchers as ethical agents who ought to know about a reality conceptualized as naturally existing in the image of statistics and probability (replete with 'constructs'), while overlooking that S&P logic and practices, which researchers made for themselves, have an appreciable role in making the world appear this way. We introduce a different way to conceptualize reality and ethics, wherein the process of scientific inquiry itself requires an examination of its own practices and commitments. Instead of resorting to decontextualized notions of 'rigor' and its 'best practices,' quantitative researchers can adopt more purposeful ways to reason about the ethics and relevance of their methods and their science. We end by considering implications for addressing 'post truth' and 'alternative facts' problems as collective concerns, wherein it is actually the pluralistic nature of description that makes defending a collectively valuable version of reality so important and urgent.
  • Publisher: Dordrecht: Springer
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 0167-4544
    EISSN: 1573-0697
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04187-8
  • Source: ProQuest One Psychology
    ProQuest Central
Back to results list
INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY (84-028) 37 755 057 Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn

Copyright © 2017 INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait