skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Growth Value Two-Factor Model

Journal of asset management, 2011-02, Vol.11 (6), p.435-451 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2011 ;COPYRIGHT 2011 Palgrave Macmillan, a Division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd. (Springer) ;ISSN: 1470-8272 ;EISSN: 1479-179X ;DOI: 10.1057/jam.2010.24

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Growth Value Two-Factor Model
  • Author: Yeh, I-Cheng ; Hsu, Tzu-Kuang
  • Subjects: Book value ; Capital assets ; Capital assets pricing model ; Dividends ; Earnings forecasting ; Earnings per share ; Economics and Finance ; Equity ; Evaluation ; Finance ; Financial Services ; Growth stocks ; Original Article ; Portfolio management ; Rate of return ; Return on equity ; Risk Management ; Risk premiums ; Studies ; Value stocks
  • Is Part Of: Journal of asset management, 2011-02, Vol.11 (6), p.435-451
  • Description: This study developed and tested a stock return prediction model called the Growth Value Two-Factor Model (GVM). The proposed GVM considers beginning and ending book value-to-price ratios (BPRs) and future return on equity (ROE) during a given period. We also used a mean-reverting process to estimate future BPR and ROE, and derived a Growth Value Indicator (GVI) able to help select stocks that deliver better performance. The GVI includes one model coefficient, determined by fitting actual market data. In the GVI, a large coefficient value implies a strong mean-reverting effect on BPR and ROE (that is, the market is overreacting and stock returns are dominated by the value factor). Conversely, a small coefficient implies a weak mean-reverting effect on BPR and ROE (that is, the market is underreacting and stock returns are dominated by the growth factor). The GVM provides a reasonable theory to explain the long-debated issue of whether value stocks or growth stocks provide the best returns. We used Standard & Poor 500 component stocks to examine the effectiveness of the GVM during the period 1998–2008. Conclusions include: (1) value and growth factors are both critical to explaining and understanding stock return performance. As value stocks and growth stocks are not opposites of one another, they should be treated two-dimensionally. (2) BPR and (1+ROE) are clearly affected by mean-reverting phenomena. The exponential-decay mean-reverting model fits well with actual stock data. (3) GVI performed better than traditional stock selection factors for selecting stocks with better performance, which indirectly demonstrated the effectiveness of the GVM.
  • Publisher: London: Palgrave Macmillan UK
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 1470-8272
    EISSN: 1479-179X
    DOI: 10.1057/jam.2010.24
  • Source: ProQuest Central
Back to results list
INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY (84-028) 37 755 057 Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn

Copyright © 2017 INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait