skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners

BMJ (Online), 2019-10, Vol.367, p.l5657-l5657 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to ;Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go tohttp://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions2019BMJ ;ISSN: 0959-8138 ;EISSN: 1756-1833 ;DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l5657

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners
  • Author: Desai, Rishi J ; Franklin, Jessica M
  • Subjects: Epidemiology ; Experiments ; Methods
  • Is Part Of: BMJ (Online), 2019-10, Vol.367, p.l5657-l5657
  • Description: This report aims to provide methodological guidance to help practitioners select the most appropriate weighting method based on propensity scores for their analysis out of many available options (eg, inverse probability treatment weights, standardised mortality ratio weights, fine stratification weights, overlap weights, and matching weights), and outlines recommendations for transparent reporting of studies using weighting based on the propensity scores.
  • Publisher: London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD
  • Language: English
  • Identifier: ISSN: 0959-8138
    EISSN: 1756-1833
    DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l5657
  • Source: ProQuest Central
Back to results list
INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY (84-028) 37 755 057 Feedback
19 Nguyen Huu Tho St. Dist.7, HCM thuvien@tdtu.edu.vn

Copyright © 2017 INSPIRE LIBRARY - TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait